vote down
flag
citizenvox.org - 10/26/2009
—
Joe Newman of Public Citizen:
How much of your personal information is Google willing to turn
over to a third party without a fight? We’ve asked a California
federal court to unseal a report that would give customers of the
world’s largest Internet company an answer to that question.
...
techcrunch.com - 10/21/2009
—
techcrunch.com —
None of the companies involved will confirm the
new Google Music service – we have “no comments”...
or absolute silence from Google, LaLa, MySpace and iLike. But the new service is all but confirmed. And we have the screenshots showing ...
(more)
Google Music Service: The Screenshots
googlemobile.blogspot.com - 10/21/2009
—
googlemobile.blogspot.com —
We're excited to announce that version 3.2 of
Google Maps for mobile is now available for BlackBerry....
This release contains many of the same features we recently launched on Windows Mobile and S60 , including Layers. Layers make it easy to view ...
(more)
Layers come to Google Maps for BlackBerry
informationweek.com - 10/22/2009
—
informationweek.com —
In a surprise announcement at the Web 2.0
Summit , Google VP of search products and user...
experience Marissa Mayer revealed an upcoming Google product called Social Search. "We've been thinking about social networks for a long time," said Mayer, ...
(more)
Web 2.0 Summit: Google Unveils Social Search
Blog Reactions
Techdirt: Google Taken To Court To Explain Why It Shut Down Someone's Gmail Over Missent Email
| Public Citizen: ‘In Google We Trust? Think Again’ http://tinyurl.com/yfqmg6e 23 days ago |
| RT @daringfireball: In Google We Trust? Think Again: http://bit.ly/yvNy8 (via @seokai) 11/2/2009 |
| Google did noting to protect the rights of one of it's users... but bent over backwards to help Rocky Mountain Bank http://bit.ly/4h9HtP 10/29/2009 |
Comments
Blog Reactions
Google Taken To Court To Explain Why It Shut Down Someone's Gmail Over Missent Email
Techdirt —
... So we have gone back to court, representing MediaPost Communications, arguing that Google's report to the Court, showing its compliance, is a judicial record that should have been, and now must be, filed publicly. We agree of course that any actual customer identification in the compliance report should be redacted." ...
Related Content







