Published 12/12/2008
by awolfe@techweb.com (Alexander Wolfe)
at InformationWeek - All Stories And Blogs
When Microsoft does something funky -- like CEO Steve Ballmer's infamous Monkey Dance -- the press can't get enough of it. Yet when the folks in Redmond act inspired, the publicity is apparently somewhat sparser. That sure seems to be the case surrounding Windows 7. My early tests of the operating system, which will succeed Vista in about a year, indicate that it's a solid, high-performing, great-looking platform. So why aren't we hearing more about it?
(link)
Tags:
Related Content
Windows 7 build 6956 vs. Windows XP SP3
blogs.zdnet.com 12/12/2008 — Several of you have asked me to add data for Windows XP to my Windows 7 vs. Windows Vista benchmark post. Well, you asked for it!
Game Rewind
nfl.com 12/12/2008 — Minimum Windows Requirements Pentium III 1GHz or higher or equivalent AMD processor with a minimum of 512MB of memory One of the following operating systems, Windows 98 Second Edition, Windows 2000, Windows ME, Windows XP, or Windows Media Center ...
Windows 7 build 6956 performance test | Hardware 2.0
blogs.zdnet.com 12/12/2008 — December 11th, 2008 Windows 7 build 6956 performance test Posted by Adrian Kingsley-Hughes @ 7:08 am Categories: On the test bench , Windows 7 Tags: 32-bit , Microsoft Windows 7 , Performance , Microsoft Windows Vista , Score , CINEBENCH R10 Next , ...
Windows 7 Beats Vista in Benchmark Test [Windows 7]
lifehacker.com 12/12/2008 — ZDNet's Hardware 2.0 blogger stacks an early beta build of Windows 7 against 32-bit Vista (and an SP1 upgrade) on the same hardware. In three out of four tests, even a non-optimized Windows 7 trumps...